tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11817097.post7756006322852665218..comments2023-09-20T22:07:15.915+09:00Comments on And you may find yourself...: Whatever BloggingSebhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15861556483662617818noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11817097.post-36715834227743649932008-03-07T02:20:00.000+09:002008-03-07T02:20:00.000+09:00sorry, the old man is agamben (rereading i remembe...sorry, the old man is agamben (rereading i remembered that you said pettman draws more on deleuze. since i don't know deleuze on whatever, maybe thats why the difference)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11817097.post-33750019858165897952008-03-07T02:14:00.000+09:002008-03-07T02:14:00.000+09:00this is a very interesting post. I did read jodi's...this is a very interesting post. I did read jodi's blog on whatever, but not the pettman book...<BR/><BR/>anyway, this might just be a difference of idiom, but a don't really recognize the figure of whatever in either Jodi or your post. The problem is that whatever tends here towards indifference...whereas, the way i tend to read the old man is as saying it is the "being thus" of a thing; not 'it does not matter which', but rather 'such that it always matters'. If you interested i blogged about it few weeks ago.<BR/><BR/>http://dionysusstoned.red.m2014.net/?p=23<BR/><BR/>i'd be interested to here what you think., since i'm struggling with these ideas as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com