data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b20/d8b20602a95f591730bca8e6438483a00b84c95d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb3b/aeb3be0cd8295f21eb4feb9675976f0dd75d0346" alt=""
In other news about people who don't fucking get it, FARK founder Drew Curtis blasted Jon Stewart for failing to properly credit news aggregator Reddit.com for drumming up support for the Rally To Restore Banality. But it quickly became clear that no one cared about a pissing contest between a Viacom employee and Condé Nast's IT department, and all was forgiven post-haste. However, in both his initial rant & his grudging "s'all good," Curtis accused The Daily Show and The Colbert Report of failing to cite FARK as a source for much of the material they lampoon:
Am I'm butthurt about not getting mentioned on the Daily Show? After 10 years, yes I am. Do they owe me? No. Is it common courtesy to do it once in awhile? Yes. Is that what this is all about then? No.At least he got it right that TDS owes him nothing and that proper citation is not what it's all about. But evidently, Curtis doesn't understand how the internet works: what matters is not who is communicating, or even what is being communicated, but the act of communicating itself. This is the greatest relay network in human history; individual nodes don't matter. Surely Curtis wouldn't argue that an individual gear-tooth is significant compared with the smooth & steady operation of the machine as a whole. Yes, a bad gear will gum up the works, but then it gets replaced, as surely as Facebook swallowed MySpace's clientele and as quickly as I can find a video that was taken off YouTube over on Megavideo or Daily Motion.
The machine speeds on well-oiled and without a care for its cogs. Because if our corporate overlords can't control the content that we cough up, they can at least make sure we're not making any money off it.
4 comments:
wait, did the daily show/colbert plagiarize Fark or something?
No, not at all. Curtis didn't even offer any evidence that Stewart & Colbert's writers even read FARK.
But even if they did, my point is there's nothing to plagiarize from FARK. It's a link-dump site! No original content, no meaningful embellishment or elaboration on existing items, nothing that can possibly be parroted in a comedy TV show. (At least, not in the way South Park parroted a few lines from a CollegeHumour.com video.) Drew Curtis' misplaced sense of entitlement is insane: he built a website out of relaying other people's content, and when a third party (e.g. Stewart) directly cites that original content without giving props to the middle man, Curtis feels hard done by. Drew Curtis contributes nothing, produces nothing, signifies nothing. He's a damned node, a relay station on a global grid, and refuses to accept how meaningless his position is.
Oooh, okay. Nice denunciation, mate, you could replace Oberlmann.
Thanks foor the post
Post a Comment